Perverse Speech?
At a recent rally, Uddhav Thackrey called Manmohan Singh a eunuch. Congress has condemned it as a “perversity of the highest order” and police is looking into the matter to see if any model code of conduct was violated. A few points:
- Why is calling someone eunuch an insult? As Amit rightly points out, being an eunuch is not a disqualification for the job of the PM; why can an eunuch not do as good or better job than a male or a female?
- While one might object to the use of “eunuch” (I don’t), why would this be violation of model code of conduct. Why is the police even spending their time on this? There is no actionable material in that statement.
- The article says: ‘Uddhav recalled the remarks made by people at his Pune rally in January terming Prime Minister as “a eunuch.”‘ So no, Uddhav didn’t call Dr. Singh a eunuch, he just mentioned people at his rally called him a eunuch. That is one additional step away from being actionable.
- A congress rep said that “BJP is resorting to such remarks out of frustration […] on the losing ground.” If you really believe that statement, let the remarks pass. They won’t hurt at all since they were made to a group of folks who would anyway not be voting congress.